See how changing a single character breaks the blockchain chain. Type a transaction and watch the hash change. Try modifying the text to see the chain validation fail.
Imagine a digital ledger that can’t be changed, copied, or erased - not by hackers, not by CEOs, not even by governments. That’s the power of a block in blockchain technology. It’s not just a piece of data. It’s a sealed, timestamped, cryptographically locked record that holds transactions and links to every block before it. Once added, it becomes part of an unbreakable chain. This is what makes blockchain trustworthy without needing banks, notaries, or middlemen.
The first block ever created is called the genesis block. It has no predecessor, but every block after it points back to the one before. If you try to change even one letter in a transaction from Block 100, its hash changes. That breaks the link to Block 101, which then breaks the link to Block 102, and so on. Everyone on the network can instantly see something’s wrong. That’s why blocks are called immutable.
Together, these parts make each block self-contained, verifiable, and linked. No one can add a fake transaction without changing the Merkle root. No one can change the timestamp without breaking the hash. And no one can alter the previous block’s hash without breaking the entire chain.
In proof-of-work (used by Bitcoin), computers called miners compete to solve a complex math puzzle. The first one to find the right nonce that produces a valid hash gets to add the block. They’re rewarded with new cryptocurrency. This process takes about 10 minutes per block on Bitcoin. It’s slow, but it’s secure because attacking the network would require controlling more than half of all mining power - which costs billions.
In proof-of-stake (used by Ethereum since 2022), validators are chosen based on how much cryptocurrency they “stake” as collateral. The more you lock up, the higher your chance of being selected to propose the next block. If you act dishonestly, you lose your stake. This method uses 99% less energy than proof-of-work and is faster - blocks can be added every few seconds.
Either way, once a block is proposed, other nodes on the network check its validity. They verify all transactions, confirm the hash matches, and ensure the consensus rules were followed. Only when enough nodes agree does the block get added to everyone’s copy of the ledger.
Blockchain blocks don’t work that way. Every node has a full copy of the chain. To change one block, you’d need to change it on over 50% of all nodes at the same time - and redo every block after it. For Bitcoin, that means controlling over 10 million computers spread across the globe. It’s practically impossible.
Also, every block has a timestamp. That means you can prove exactly when a transaction happened. If you’re auditing a supply chain, you can see when a medicine left the factory, when it crossed the border, and when it reached the pharmacy - all recorded permanently. No one can say, “We didn’t ship it,” because the block says otherwise.
First, you can’t delete data. If someone sends Bitcoin to the wrong address, you can’t reverse it. The only solution is to send a new transaction back. That’s fine for money, but what if you accidentally record someone’s private medical data? You can’t erase it. That’s why some blockchains are designed for public transparency, and others - like private enterprise chains - use permissioned access to control who can write data.
Second, blocks are slow. Bitcoin can handle about 7 transactions per second. Visa handles 24,000. That’s why Bitcoin isn’t used for buying coffee - it’s used for settling large transfers between exchanges or countries.
Third, blocks use a lot of energy - at least in proof-of-work systems. Bitcoin mining uses more electricity than some small countries. That’s why many newer blockchains moved to proof-of-stake. It’s not just greener - it’s cheaper and faster.
In each case, the block acts as a tamper-proof timestamped receipt. It doesn’t store the whole file - just a hash of it. The real data stays in secure servers. But the proof of authenticity? That’s on the blockchain.
Layer-2 networks like the Lightning Network for Bitcoin let thousands of transactions happen off-chain, then settle them in one block. That cuts costs and speeds things up.
New block structures like “block DAGs” (directed acyclic graphs) let multiple blocks be added at once, instead of one after another. That removes the bottleneck.
And as energy-efficient consensus methods become standard, we’ll see blocks used in more everyday systems - voting, insurance claims, even streaming royalties. The core idea won’t change: secure, transparent, unchangeable records. But how they’re built and used? That’s evolving fast.
No, blocks cannot be deleted from a blockchain. Once a block is added and confirmed by the network, it becomes part of the permanent, immutable ledger. If someone tries to remove or alter a block, the cryptographic hash of that block changes, which breaks the link to all following blocks. This inconsistency is instantly detected by every node on the network, and the altered chain is rejected. The only way to “correct” a mistake is to add a new transaction that reverses the effect - but the original block still remains in the chain.
Block size varies by blockchain. Bitcoin’s blocks are capped at 1 MB, which holds about 2,000-3,000 transactions. Ethereum blocks are measured in gas limit, not size, and can hold around 100-200 transactions per second. Newer blockchains like Solana or Polygon have much larger blocks - some can process over 10,000 transactions per block. The size is a trade-off: bigger blocks mean faster processing but require more storage and bandwidth from network nodes.
A transaction is a single action - like sending 0.1 ETH from one wallet to another. A block is a group of many verified transactions bundled together and added to the blockchain at once. Think of transactions as individual sentences and blocks as paragraphs. Multiple transactions are collected, validated, and then sealed into one block. Each block can contain hundreds or thousands of transactions, depending on the network’s rules and capacity.
The timestamp proves when a block was created and helps maintain the correct chronological order of transactions. Without timestamps, it would be impossible to know which transaction happened first - especially when multiple transactions are processed simultaneously. Timestamps also help prevent replay attacks and ensure consensus mechanisms work correctly. While the time isn’t always perfectly accurate (nodes can have slightly different clocks), the network uses median time across nodes to enforce order.
No. While the core idea - transactions, hash of previous block, timestamp - is common, details vary. Bitcoin uses a simple 1 MB block with proof-of-work. Ethereum uses variable-sized blocks based on gas limits and proof-of-stake. Some blockchains like Corda don’t use blocks at all - they use individual transaction chains. Others, like IOTA, use a structure called a Tangle, which is more like a web than a chain. So while the term “block” is widely used, not every blockchain actually uses blocks in the same way.
Terry Watson
November 22, 2025 AT 04:08Okay, so imagine your bank account is a block-once you send money, it’s locked in forever. No ‘oops I meant to send $50’-it’s $50 gone, and the whole chain knows it. That’s both terrifying and beautiful. I love this tech because it doesn’t care who you are. No bias. No favoritism. Just math and trust. I’m not even a crypto bro, but this? This is the future of accountability.
And honestly? If governments can’t erase records, maybe we’ll finally stop lying about history. Imagine a world where corruption leaves a digital fingerprint. Chills.