This tool calculates potential legal risks for cryptocurrency activities in Bangladesh based on the current legal framework. Remember: It's not the crypto that's illegal—it's how you use it.
When you hear that trading cryptocurrency in Bangladesh can land you in jail for 12 years, it sounds like a hard-line ban. But the truth is more complicated - and far more confusing. There’s no law that says, "Trading Bitcoin is illegal and punishable by 12 years." Instead, what you’re hearing is a warning from Bangladesh Bank, repeated over and over, that crypto transactions could trigger penalties under existing financial crime laws. The 12-year figure? It’s not in any statute. It’s an extrapolation - and it’s been misquoted so often that most people believe it’s law.
The number 12 comes from a mix-up between Bangladesh Bank’s public statements and the actual text of the country’s laws. In 2014, Bangladesh Bank issued its first warning about Bitcoin, saying any transaction involving cryptocurrency was a punishable offense. Officials told reporters that violators could face up to 12 years in prison. But when you look at the laws they cited - the Money Laundering Prevention Act 2012 - the maximum penalty is 10 years, not 12. The Anti-Terrorism Act 2009, added to the warning in 2017, doesn’t even mention cryptocurrency. The Digital Security Act 2018 caps penalties at 7 years for repeat offenses involving unauthorized electronic transactions.
So where did 12 come from? Legal experts believe it was a guess - or a scare tactic - by central bank officials trying to deter public interest in crypto. It stuck. International media picked it up, headlines screamed, and the myth became fact. Even today, you’ll find articles, forums, and YouTube videos repeating the 12-year claim as if it’s written in stone. But the law doesn’t back it up.
Bangladesh Bank doesn’t need a new law to crack down on crypto. It uses three old ones:
Here’s the key point: It’s not the crypto that’s illegal. It’s how you use it. If you use taka to buy Bitcoin and then send it overseas to pay for drugs, that’s a crime - because you broke FERA and the Money Laundering Act. If you buy Bitcoin to hold it as an investment, without moving money out of the country illegally? The law doesn’t say you’re breaking the rules. But the bank still warns against it - and that’s where the gray zone begins.
Bangladesh Bank’s notices are labeled "Cautionary Notices." That’s not the same as a ban. A ban would be a law passed by Parliament. A caution is a warning - like telling people not to swim in a flooded river because it’s dangerous. The river isn’t legally off-limits, but if you drown, you’re on your own.
Legal analysts from Mahbub & Company have said it plainly: "The regulator has fallen short of banning or criminalizing the use of Bitcoin except in cases where it is used to commit an existing offense." Think of it this way: Using cash to bribe a police officer is illegal. But owning cash? Not illegal. The same logic applies here.
And yet, banks are ordered to block crypto-related transactions. ATMs won’t let you withdraw taka for Binance deposits. Mobile banking apps flag transfers to crypto exchanges. If you try to send money to a foreign crypto platform, your transaction gets rejected. That’s enforcement - not legislation.
Here’s the most surprising part: No one has been sentenced to 12 years for crypto trading. Not one case. Not even close.
According to Bangladesh’s Anti-Money Laundering Department’s 2022 report, only 37 cases nationwide were filed under digital financial crime statutes. None involved crypto trading as the primary charge. In 2024, the Cyber Security Division recorded 17 crypto-related cases. Most involved fraud, hacking, or large-scale money laundering operations - not ordinary people buying Bitcoin on Binance.
Enforcement is selective. If you’re a small-time trader using your phone to swap taka for USDT, you’re unlikely to be targeted. But if you’re running a P2P exchange out of your home, collecting thousands of dollars from dozens of people, and moving money offshore? That’s when the authorities show up.
Chainalysis reported that between July 2021 and June 2022, crypto transaction volume in Bangladesh jumped 206%. That’s more than 2 million people using crypto - despite the warnings. P2P trading on platforms like Binance and LocalBitcoins grew by 347% after the 2021 crackdown. People aren’t stopping. They’re just getting smarter.
Bangladesh’s government doesn’t hate technology. In 2020, it launched a National Blockchain Strategy - a plan to use blockchain for land records, voting, and public services. The government wants the tech - just not the currency.
This contradiction is intentional. Blockchain is seen as a tool for efficiency and transparency. Cryptocurrency? It’s seen as a threat to financial control. The central bank fears losing power over money flows. If people can send value across borders without banks, the state loses its grip on taxation, surveillance, and capital controls.
That’s why the message is so confusing: "We don’t ban blockchain. We just ban crypto." But in practice, it’s hard to separate the two. Many crypto wallets use blockchain. Many blockchain projects use tokens. The line is blurry - and the government is choosing to blur it further.
If you’re caught trading crypto, here’s what you’re likely to face:
Most cases end in fines, not jail. In 2023, the Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission admitted that inconsistent enforcement is a major problem. They don’t have the resources, or the legal clarity, to go after millions of small traders.
People aren’t waiting for the law to change. They’re working around it:
These methods aren’t legal. But they’re common. And as long as enforcement stays inconsistent, they’ll keep working.
Bangladesh isn’t alone. China banned crypto. India taxed it. Vietnam cracked down. But Bangladesh’s approach is unique - it’s a warning without a law, a threat without a track record. The result? A population caught between fear and opportunity.
For young professionals, crypto is a way to save money, hedge against inflation, and access global markets. For the government, it’s a loss of control. The central bank wants to protect the taka. But the taka is losing value. People are looking for alternatives.
Until Parliament passes a clear law - either banning crypto outright or regulating it - the 12-year myth will live on. And so will the trading.